Charles E. Smith Jewish Day School
72° Rockville, MD
The student news site of Charles E. Smith Jewish Day School

The Lion's Tale

The student news site of Charles E. Smith Jewish Day School

The Lion's Tale

The student news site of Charles E. Smith Jewish Day School

The Lion's Tale

This will be the fourth debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden.
Israel-Hamas War topics to look out for in the Presidential Debate
Stella Muzin, Editor-in-Chief • June 26, 2024

The presidential debate on June 27 may seem to be no different from that of the 2020 election, but really, there is so much more for Joe Biden...

Lions On Film: What advice do you have for students entering your current grade next year?
Mia Forseter, Sports Editor • June 2, 2024

Money doesn’t grow on trees
Money doesn’t grow on trees
Ari Kittrie, Managing Editor, Web • June 2, 2024

The end of the school year means juniors like myself will soon need to consider tuition prices for higher education across the United States....

Summer shouldn't be serious
Aliza Bellas, Managing Editor, Copy • June 2, 2024

Since I was seven years old, I’ve spent my academic years looking forward to my three-week session at Capital Camps each summer. Despite any...

Education miscalculation
Education miscalculation
Maiya Blumenthal and Aviv SteinJune 2, 2024

When I went to Israel with my family for the first time in the summer of 2018, I was captivated by the country. Not only did I love walking around...

Bring them home
Bring them home
The Lion's TaleJune 2, 2024

In the midst of all of the protests seen on various college campuses across the country, it seems as though the Israel-Hamas war has become even...

The open letters don’t represent the full spectrum of viewpoints at CESJDS

Ari Kittrie
The extreme viewpoints conveyed by the two opposing open letters don’t fully represent the majority of people’s opinions on the war in Israel at JDS.

The current conflict in Israel and Gaza has sparked a fierce debate within the Jewish community, in addition to the global response after Oct. 7. CESJDS is no exception with the release of multiple open letters to the community.  From “Israeli military occupation as apartheid” and “genocidal intent” in the original letter to “this small group of self-hating Jews” in reference to those who signed the first letter by the responding group, there is no question that the terminology used in both open letters to the community is emotionally charged and inflammatory. 

But at the end of the day, all our school got was negative press attention and the presumption that our community is more divided than ever. So what can we gain from this?

Not only do both letters have provocative language, but they also seem to represent the two extremes of potential opinions on the infinitely large series of spectra on the Arab-Israeli conflict from the perspective of Jews. This paints the false assumption that these polar opposite views are the only two views that exist within the school, especially from the perspective of an outsider.

But that isn’t true. From what I have gathered from my peers and teachers, it seems that there’s a form of a “silent majority” that has more mixed and/or nuanced views on any and all aspects of the ongoing conflict and the Arab-Israeli conflict as a whole.

In addition, the large number of current students who signed the response letter furthers that narrative. Although the primary reason for signing it seemed to be in support of Israel and JDS, by endorsing a document with belittling and demeaning language, it is implied that those who signed it support 100% of the content within. 

It’s important to recognize the thought processes behind some of the conclusions that people come to about any opinion, but especially regarding such a sensitive topic as this one. Many members of our community have ties to the region, which may influence their views. And political affiliations will color anybody’s views on the conflict as a result of the polarizing nature of our political system.

No opinion should be immediately discredited based on emotional reactions or logical shortcuts, as that never yields any positive outcome for that conversation. But if you want to prove something wrong, it’s imperative to use confirmed factual evidence and logic to support your argument.

However, there are some facts in relation to the CESJDS community that I believe should be enumerated in order to invalidate some of the phrasing and assertions used in both articles. 

The statement that JDS’s education on the conflict was “defined by false narratives and glaring omissions… funnel[s] generations of Jewish youth toward unconditional support for Israel’s militarism” is an assumption based solely upon an observation of some people within the JDS community and not the actual education that is provided. 

As someone who took both the History of Modern Israel and Arab-Israeli Conflict courses in the past year, I can say that both courses recognize and delve deeply into the nuance and retelling of history from both distinct perspectives. There is no “cognitive dissonance” at play, as the whole purpose of the latter course is to gain as much of an informed view of the facts, and how both sides portray them. 

Some may go into those courses with preconceived notions about the conflict, which will color how they view the content of the classes. But assuming that because some people came out of JDS holding certain views, it does not mean that their education at JDS is to blame.

Regarding the response letter, I feel less confident in my critique. I know that many people at JDS fully support its core message of fighting against antisemitism at home and abroad, and I do as well. But referring to those who wrote and signed the first letter as “self-hating Jews” and alienating them from our community is a contradiction to the values of pluralism and community, both of which are core to JDS. 

The hundreds upon hundreds of alumni and their parents, in addition to approximately 75 current students who endorsed these hurtful words, especially in comparison to the slim number of those who signed the first open letter, only magnifies the perceived message of intolerance that is explicitly stated in its text.

I recognize how emotionally charged this topic is for those who have a personal connection to it. But we still need to be able to treat everyone with the same basic decency that we all expect from others. 

I sincerely hope and remain optimistic that the majority of those who signed both letters do not support the marginalization of opposing viewpoints. If that were the case, no respectful debate could ever occur at this school. Although I have seen some heated arguments, I have also participated in and overheard productive dialogue about the conflict. This allows me to hold out hope for the future of our community.

Leave a Comment
More to Discover
About the Contributors
Jonah Beinart
Jonah Beinart, Features Editor
Breaking news: there’s a new features editor in town, and he’s ready to continue his work on The Lion’s Tale. Jonah is a section editor on the Bohr Franklin Science Journal and writes for his neighborhood newspaper, the Lakelands Leader. He is also an avid runner and participates in cross-country and track throughout the year. He hopes that he can round out high school with a great year on the publication. His favorite poem is the Jabberwocky  
Ari Kittrie
Ari Kittrie, Managing Editor, Web
Being a Reporter and Opinion Editor during the last few years, Ari is ready to take on the position of Managing Editor. His experience includes being an Election Judge for the Montgomery County Board of Elections and volunteering for various politicians from all levels of government. Additionally, Ari enjoys in his free time wrestling, volleyball, and sometimes cooking.  

Comments (0)

All The Lion's Tale Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *